Find relevant scholarly articles now

A Question for Readers The relevant DAS disclosures were published from June 2026 by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Geneva. Meta publicly disclosed Muse/Sentinel on 8 September 2026. Readers are requested to independently identify which technical elements were already disclosed in the earlier DAS materials and which elements are genuinely Meta-specific engineering choices. Independent Review Challenge Download the single primary-source PDF and independently examine, at minimum: Embodiment 84 — Reasoning-to-Effectuation Architecture 85.B2 — Agent Sandbox Egress Finality Gate RR — Instruction Taint Boundary Object QQ / QQ.6 — downstream taint and provenance propagation related provenance and enforcement material, including 85.A2 Then compare those disclosures directly with Meta’s publicly described Muse / Sentinel architecture. Do not rely on my mapping or conclusion. Ask instead: What corresponds? What does not? Which differences are architectural, and which are merely implementation choices? Does the earlier disclosure anticipate the same authority/effectuation relationship, provenance and taint handling, sandbox-to-host enforcement, and consequential-action control? Readers are encouraged to use their own prompts, their own AI systems, or no AI at all, and to give their own conclusion based on the primary-source record. This record is intentionally minimal. It contains a single primary-source technical disclosure filed before Meta publicly introduced Muse/Sentinel on 8 September 2026. Rather than providing readers with a predetermined component-by-component conclusion, this record invites independent technical review of the original disclosure itself. Readers are particularly invited to examine Section 85.B2 — “Agent Sandbox Egress Finality Gate”, together with the related embodiments and architectural definitions in the document, and independently compare them with the publicly described Meta Muse/Sentinel architecture. The central questions are simple: Does the earlier disclosure describe a materially similar authority and effectuation-control architecture? Which similarities concern the underlying causal control structure, and which are merely common security techniques or implementation choices? How should features such as sandbox isolation, independent authorization, egress interception, provenance or risk information, protected validation, bounded permission, credential handling, proxy-side or sink-side enforcement, kernel/eBPF mechanisms, and non-bypassable external effectuation be mapped? Readers should not assume equivalence merely because terminology differs, nor assume difference merely because different implementation technologies are used. The purpose of this record is not to allege copying or infringement. Independent development remains entirely possible. The purpose is narrower: to place the earlier primary-source disclosure before technical, patent, security, and AI-infrastructure reviewers and ask them to determine for themselves what correspondence—if any—the evidence supports. Readers are encouraged to use their own methodology, their own prompts, different AI systems, or no AI at all, and to distinguish carefully between: express disclosure → necessary implication → reasonable technical mapping → unsupported inference. The requested outcome is not agreement with the author. It is an independently reproducible conclusion based on the source document.

Google states that its Pixel Binary Transparency log covers every Pixel 6 and newer factory image offered for download. This check listed every such image on the download page and looked each one up in the log. On 2026-09-15, 33 of 1,070 images were absent. Twenty-nine of those made up the entire January 2026 release (build BP4A.260105.004, 15 devices), and one was confirmed absent by its VBMeta digest as well as by name. A separate 103 Android 17 images were logged under a generic system fingerprint that a phone does not report. Google confirmed both findings, traced the first to a missed log-append run, and appended the 29 images at indices 1134–1162. A recheck on 2026-09-30 found 0 of 1,091 images absent. The fingerprint mismatch remains open. Second Measurement SM-001. The HTML version at markovianprotocol.com is the canonical copy; its SHA-256 is recorded in leaf 8971 of log.markovianprotocol.com. The reproduction script is included.

This bulletin reports on drug-related hospitalisations (see Panel A for definition) in Australia from 1999-00 to 2018-19, with a particular focus on opioid-, amphetamine and other stimulant-, cannabinoid-, and cocaine-related hospitalisations as per the aims of the Drug Trends program of work. Data were extracted from the National Hospital Morbidity Database held by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Full details of methods are available for download and should be read alongside this bulletin.

Jogos instantâneos online: o que são e como funcionam em 2026 Os jogos instantâneos online são a categoria que mais cresce no mercado brasileiro de entretenimento digital: a rodada começa e termina em segundos, sem download, sem espera pelo apito final de um jogo e sem acompanhar animações longas de rolos. Você escolhe o título, define o valor, confirma e vê o desfecho quase imediatamente. Neste guia explicamos o que são esses jogos, como funcionam por dentro, quais formatos existem hoje, por que ganharam tanto espaço no Brasil e quais cuidados separam diversão de prejuízo. O que exatamente é um jogo instantâneo Um jogo instantâneo é um formato em que o resultado é definido por um gerador de números aleatórios (RNG) e revelado em poucos segundos. Diferente dos slots tradicionais, não há uma "esteira" visual longa de símbolos; diferente das apostas esportivas, não existe um evento externo cujo desfecho precise acontecer. A rodada é autossuficiente: começa, resolve e fecha no mesmo instante. Essa característica muda a experiência de três formas. Primeiro, o ritmo: em vez de uma rodada a cada trinta segundos, o jogador pode fazer várias por minuto. Segundo, a leitura do resultado, que é binária e imediata — ganhou ou não ganhou. Terceiro, o controle de orçamento, que passa a depender inteiramente da disciplina do usuário, porque a velocidade não dá tempo para pensar entre uma rodada e outra. Como funcionam por dentro Todo jogo instantâneo sério roda sobre três pilares técnicos. 1. Gerador de números aleatórios (RNG). O resultado de cada rodada é sorteado por software auditado. Em plataformas reguladas, o RNG é testado por laboratórios independentes para garantir que os resultados sejam imprevisíveis e que a margem declarada seja a real. 2. Retorno ao jogador (RTP). O RTP indica quanto, em média, volta ao jogador ao longo de milhões de rodadas. Um RTP de 96% significa que a plataforma retém 4% no longo prazo. É uma média estatística, não uma promessa para a sua sessão. 3. Volatilidade. Diz o quão raros e quão grandes são os prêmios. Baixa volatilidade paga pouco e com frequência; alta volatilidade paga raramente e em valores maiores. Dois jogos com o mesmo RTP podem ter sensações completamente diferentes por causa disso. Quais formatos existem Crash e multiplicadores: um valor sobe e o jogador precisa sacar antes de ele "estourar". Simples de entender e extremamente rápido. Dados e roletas instantâneas: variantes curtas que resolvem em uma única rodada. Minijogos estilo "conquista" e "aviator": curvas visuais curtas com ponto de saída definido pelo usuário. Sorteios numéricos: o usuário escolhe um intervalo e o resultado sai na hora. Todos compartilham a mesma lógica: decisão rápida, resultado imediato, rodada curta. Por que cresceram tanto no Brasil Três fatores explicam a popularidade. A penetração do celular tornou o formato acessível em qualquer lugar. O Pix reduziu o atrito de depósito e saque a poucos toques. E o próprio formato casa bem com sessões curtas de lazer — a pessoa joga cinco minutos no intervalo, não precisa reservar uma hora. O resultado é uma categoria que reúne a simplicidade dos slots com a sensação de controle das apostas de evento, mas sem a espera de nenhum dos dois. Como escolher onde jogar Antes de qualquer rodada, vale verificar quatro pontos objetivos: Regulamentação e licença da operadora. RTP e volatilidade declarados de cada jogo. Limites de depósito, perda e tempo definidos por você, não pela plataforma. Velocidade e transparência do saque, especialmente em Pix. Quem faz essa checagem antes joga com informação; quem pula direto para a rodada joga no escuro. Se você quer ver como esses formatos aparecem na prática, com regras explicadas e exemplos de rodada passo a passo, temos um material dedicado em https://betaobetcasino.online/jogos-instantaneos/ — com a mecânica descrita em detalhe, sem promessa de ganho fácil. Bônus, limites e jogo responsável Bônus têm condições: exigência de aposta, prazo de validade, teto de saque e exclusões. Um bônus só vale a pena quando as condições cabem no seu jeito de jogar — não o contrário. E o ponto mais importante de todos: jogo instantâneo é entretenimento, não fonte de renda. Defina um orçamento fixo antes de começar, nunca persiga perdas, faça pausas e use as ferramentas de autoexclusão se sentir que a linha foi ultrapassada. Se o jogo deixar de ser diversão, ele deixou de fazer sentido. Perguntas frequentes Jogo instantâneo é confiável? Quando a plataforma é licenciada e o RNG é auditado por terceiros, sim — a imprevisibilidade e o RTP podem ser verificados. Dá para ganhar dinheiro de forma consistente? Não como rotina. É entretenimento com resultado aleatório: existem ganhos e existem perdas, e o RTP garante que a casa fica com uma margem no longo prazo. Qual é a diferença para os slots? A velocidade e a apresentação. Nos instantâneos a rodada resolve em segundos e não há esteira de símbolos; nos slots, a animação é parte da experiência. Preciso baixar aplicativo? Não. Os formatos instantâneos são feitos para rodar direto no navegador do celular. Como controlar o orçamento? Definindo um limite antes de jogar, separando o dinheiro de lazer e ignorando a tentativa de "recuperar" perdas. A velocidade do formato é justamente o que torna esse limite obrigatório. Referências Wikipedia — Gambling Wikipedia — Problem gambling

This thesis focuses specifically on dispute problems related to soft products, i.e. those that are intangible and therefore requiring no physical delivery. With the growing demand for these types of products, e.g. downloadable films, music, software, and prepaid calling time, the prevention of fraudulent transactions is becoming increasingly important. Reasons for the rise in the number of fraudulent transactions include merchants being unable to see the customer to verify an ID or signature and E-commerce enabling soft-products and services to be acquired via soft delivery methods: email, download or logging in. The introductory section provides a critique of current e-commerce fraud detection and prevention techniques and shows that not all are suitable for e-commerce, especially soft-products, and therefore unable to provide complete protection against fraud. The future relating to the detection and prevention of e-commerce fraud is then discussed, leading to suggestions regarding the improvement of the current state-of-the-art technique, the Address Verification Service (AVS), which is used to accommodate the introduction of soft-products. Apart from the exchange process problems, i.e. those involving money and goods, attention is also paid to other important factors such as timing and quality that are usually neglected in these detection and prevention techniques. Dispute scenarios from many different perspectives have been analysed, viz. computer science, business, legal and that of the participants themselves. From the analyses, all possible dispute cases have been formally listed using the 'Truth Table' approach. This analysis has then led to the design of a comprehensive taxonomy framework for dispute in e-commerce. The term Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), is the online technology applied to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) which is resolving disputes other than via litigation in the courts. Current ODR systems and their suitability for the e-commercial world have been examined, concluding that not all are appropriate for e-commerce situations (since most still involve a human element and often make the resolution process more costly than the actual item under dispute). The proposed solution to the problem is by automating the online dispute resolution process. The total solution is described in two parts (i) an E-commerce Transaction Protocol (ETP) forming the infrastructure where the transaction will take place and be able to accommodate any new improvements in the future, and (ii) an Automated Online Dispute Resolution (AODR) system which should automatically resolve any dispute occurring within the proposed e-commerce model. In order for the AODR to resolve any dispute, a product/payment specific plug-in (add-on) has been incorporated into the system. For illustration purposes, credit cards as a payment method has been selected and the appropriate plug-in specification for soft products and credit cards created. The concept of providing every soft product with a quality certificate has also been discussed. A concluding case study of e-commerce in Saudi Arabia has been used to test the viability of both the e-commerce dispute taxonomy and the proposed model. The case study shows the suitability of using ETP with AODR in order to resolve soft-product disputes automatically. Limitations of the work and further research possibilities have then been identified.

An independent public insights report examining how people in Brunei Darussalam understand, use and experience generative artificial intelligence, with attention to adoption, confidence, ethics, trust, access to training, bias and representation and potential workforce implications. The findings are based on a bilingual online survey conducted from 5 April to 4 August 2025 among 431 consenting respondents residing in Brunei Darussalam. The study provides a snapshot of respondents' experiences and perceptions and is not intended to be statistically representative of the entire Brunei population. Published independently by Mr Syaf Insights in June 2026. The full report is available as a free download through Mr Syaf Insights via Syafiq Bakar's Gumroad. Direct Gumroad Download Page Companion Page

Die überbetriebliche Lehrlingsunterweisung (ÜLU) bezeichnet die überbetriebliche Vermittlung von Ausbildungsinhalten in sogenannten Überbetrieblichen Bildungsstätten (ÜBS). Sie ergänzt die betriebliche Ausbildung und ist ein wichtiger Baustein zur Qualitätssicherung der dualen Berufsausbildung und für den Technologietransfer im Handwerk. Zur Entlastung der Ausbildungsbetriebe des Handwerks von Kosten der ÜLU gewährt das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWE) Zuschüsse für die Teilnahme von Auszubildenden in der Fachstufe (2.-4. Ausbildungsjahr) an Lehrgängen der ÜLU. Mit dieser Förderung soll die Ausbildungsbereitschaft und -fähigkeit der Handwerksbetriebe gestärkt bzw. erhalten werden. Das Heinz-Piest-Institut für Handwerkstechnik (HPI) untersucht im Rahmen seiner Grundaufgaben seit über 40 Jahren jährlich die Inanspruchnahme an ÜLU-Lehrgängen durch Auszubildende in der Fachstufe. Hierzu werden unterschiedliche Größen und Kennzahlen ermittelt und auf Gesamtebene sowie nach Bundesländern, Gewerbegruppen und Berufen dargestellt. Die vorliegende Studie gibt einen Überblick über Die vom Bundeswirtschaftsministerium für die Berufe des Handwerks anerkannten ÜLU-Lehrgänge Die ÜLU-Teilnahmezahlen und das sich hieraus ergebende Unterweisungsvolumen Kennzahlen im Verhältnis zur Anzahl der Auszubildenden Das geförderte ÜLU-Unterbringungsvolumen In dieser Veröffentlichung werden die Ergebnisse für das Untersuchungsjahr 2025 dargestellt. Die Studien aus den Vorjahren stehen auf der Internetseite des HPI zum Download zur Verfügung.

The Rhythm: Ontological Foundations of Physics A Unified Geometric and Spectral Framework for Fundamental Physics The Rhythm (TR) demonstrates that reality emerges from a two-dimensional rhythmic structure defined by intrinsic time (τ) and phase (θ).From this primary structure, geometry, topology, and spectra naturally arise, determining all physical constants — masses, coupling strengths, and cosmological parameters — directly from geometry, without any empirical fitting. Core Principles Spacetime is derived as a coarse-grained limit of the rhythm manifold. Quantum behavior results from the spectral quantization of the Dirac–Lichnerowicz operator. Gravitation and relativity emerge as geometric manifestations of rhythm curvature. Particle spectra and the Standard Model structure are determined by topological and spectral invariants. Connections to PhysicsTR reproduces quantum mechanics in the local limit, yields general relativity in the macroscopic regime, and derives Standard Model hierarchies and constants (α, G, Λ) purely from geometric principles. Structure Manifest: conceptual and ontological synthesis Appendix: formal derivations and SI scaling relations The Rhythm – A Spectral–Geometric Derivation of the Electron Mass, Lambda, Fine Structure and Physical Constants from the Dirac Spectrum on the Torus Link below contains all mathematical derivations and proofs underlying the framework. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21157090 Download all files and upload them into the math AI.

This bulletin series reports on trends in the availability and type of substances sold on the internet via cryptomarkets over the last 13 months (a new bulletin is released typically every four months). The current bulletin focuses on analysis of listings from 1st January 2020 to 31st January 2021. Drug Trends have identified, crawled (or ‘scraped’), extracted, categorised and analysed drug listings on cryptomarkets on a weekly basis since 1st January 2014, formerly using VBA programming processes, and since 9th August 2018 using a range of programmed automated processes in Python that operate with minimal manual input. Following extraction of common text features across each listing (e.g., drug listing name, vendor name and the price in bitcoin or dollars), individual listings are categorised according to a pre-specified classification structure using a rules-based approach through text-matching in the first instance, followed by a long short-term memory (LSTM) artificial neural network (target predictive percentage 90%) that has been trained on historically categorised listings for those not matched through the former process. Further background and information regarding the methods are available for download.

A focused follow-up analysis examining gender differences in reported Generative AI adoption and readiness in Brunei Darussalam. The report returns to the same dataset used in the June 2026 Brunei and Generative AI public report and asks whether similar levels of adoption are accompanied by similar experiences of understanding, confidence, uncertainty and access to learning. The analysis is based on 431 consenting respondents residing in Brunei Darussalam, including 250 female respondents and 181 male respondents. While overall Generative AI adoption was similar by gender, the findings show substantial differences in self-reported understanding and confidence. These results should not be interpreted as evidence that one gender has greater or lesser actual AI competence, as the survey did not include an objective knowledge or competency assessment. This report is an independent publication by Mr Syaf Insights and should be read alongside Brunei and Generative AI: An Independent Insights Report on Adoption, Ethics and Society, which provides the broader study context and responsible AI readiness framework. The full report is available as a free download through Mr Syaf Insights via Gumroad. Direct Gumroad Download Page Companion Page